12/11/2023 0 Comments Id yelp reviewerThis could be the name of a journal (Journal of Scientific Investigations) or an organization (Scholarly Publisher, State University) Group (required): An identifier used to group together the reviews on the ORCID record it describes the group of which the review is part.Identifier (required): The persistent identifier for the organization.Country (required): The country where the organizer is based.Region: The region where the organizer is based.City (required): The city where the organizer is based.Convening organization (required): This describes the organization which organized the review - a journal publisher, conference organizer, funding agency, faculty, etc. Identifier (required): The reviewer’s ORCID iD.chair, editor, member, organizer, reviewer Role (required): The individual’s role in the review process, e.g.Importantly, each of these components involves a persistent identifier. Optionally, a review activity can include a fourth element: information about the subject of the review. In both cases, in order for your ORCID record to be updated, you will need to verify your iD by signing into ORCID, and grant the review organizer or third-party recognition review permission to update your ORCID record with information about your review contribution.Įach review activity combines three elements: information about the reviewer about the organization sponsoring (or convening) the review and about the review itself. This can be done by the organizer of the review or evaluation, such as a publisher, society, funder, or research institution, or it can be done by a third-party review recognition service, such as Web of Science, which works with review organizers to recognize your reviews. Peer reviews can only be added to your ORCID record by a trusted organization using Member API credentials. ORCID supports a range of review activities, from double blind reviews, which provide minimum information about a review, to open reviews, which if wished can point directly to the review report and the work that was reviewed. In addition, like works, “Other IDs” (person IDs), and grants, individual reviews are automatically grouped together based on a shared review identifier. Unlike other sections of the ORCID record, reviews are automatically aggregated together based on a group identifier, usually for the organization or publication which organized the review. These contributions can include evaluation of journal articles and books, as well as conference programs, grant award applications, and hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. The peer review section of your ORCID record recognizes individual contributions that you have made to other organizations. This is why ORCID has worked with members of the community to develop ways to recognize resource use and enable you to share that information with publishers, funders, and research organizations. Using your ORCID iD to enable connections with the organizations for which you perform reviews raises the visibility of your efforts and contributions. Peer review is a fundamental part of the research lifecycle. You must make the review activity visible to everyone in order for it to also display on your public ORCID record.įor recording information about serving as a peer reviewer for a journal, conference, faculty, or more, please use the Service affiliation. The peer review section will not appear on your personal (private) ORCID record until a trusted organization has added a review to your ORCID record. Like research resources and person identifiers, peer reviews can only be added to your ORCID record by a trusted organization using Member API credentials, with your explicit permission – you cannot manually add them to your record yourself. The organization for which you are carrying out the peer review or evaluation will typically request your iD during the review submission process, as well as asking for permission to update your ORCID record after you complete the review. The Peer review section of your ORCID record is for information about your individual peer review contributions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |